Jubilant, Giordano and other apparel brands were accused of tax losses appellate speech threatened to withdraw Taiwan

According to Hong Kong's Chungking News Agency, four Hong Kong-based manufacturers such as HANGTEN and Giordano, which are well-known among Taiwanese residents, were heavily punished by NT $ 500 million by tax authorities in Taiwan between 1999 and 2002. Hong Kong businessmen seeking administrative appeal or being convicted of losing their case now intend to travel across the Taiwan territory to Ma Ying-jeou and threatened to withdraw Taiwan. All the stores in Taiwan may face blow-out lights. In Taipei, the four well-known Hong Kong-priced apparel brands such as HANGTEN, GIORDANO, Baleno and Bossini, which focus on young offs in Taiwan, have been deeply rooted in Taiwan for many years. Their products are generally welcomed by consumers and many of them have one or two now Because the issue of invoicing provoked controversy over tax arrears, the tax department of Taiwan tax recovery plus a fine. For this dispute over tax arrears, the industry claims to have "different perceptions" of tax revenue. According to regulations, the total distribution sold 100 yuan of clothes, to open a 100 yuan invoice to the guests, but four Hong Kong businessmen in the department store set up counters mode of operation, that is, only invoices to store cooperative store, the invoice amount is Total sales deducted from the rent, and then by the cooperative store invoice to consumers; accordingly, 4 Hong Kong companies deduct 20 yuan rental rent, only 80 yuan invoice to the cooperative store, and in order to reported sales tax, then by the store to open 100 yuan Invoice to the consumer. However, the tax authorities in Taiwan regard the 4 Hong Kong businessmen as essentially renting their own clothes and selling clothes. Instead of buying and selling relationships with various cooperative stores, the tax authorities in Taiwan regard the lease relationship between the tenant and the landlord. They should invoice the consumers directly according to the total turnover ; They pay the store (landlord) unissued money, should be paid, and then impose a fine of 3 times. In addition, the four vendors to the store rent but did not obtain vouchers, were also issued a ticket. 4 The company has to pay a total of more than 500 million yuan and fined a total of more than 29 million yuan. Although it litigated the "administrative court" in Taiwan, it failed to do so. Four employers jointly sent an affidavit to turn to Ma Ying-jeou, Wu Dun-yi, Wang Jin-ping and "Judiciary deans" Lai Yingzhao, "Chief Superintendent" Wang Jiantao, "Judicial Yuan" Justice, "Finance Minister" Li Shudai and " "Wait. Among them, the HANGTEN manufacturer Handen that lost the lawsuit came out that the handeng big boss personally wanted to cross the sea to express his feelings and hoped that Ma Ying-jeou would act justice and even threatened that the four manufacturers would withdraw from Taiwan. However, tax officials in Taipei on the 22nd stressed that if the sales of 100 yuan to sell a piece of clothing, Handeng and other companies only 80 yuan invoice to the owner of the house, so omission of 20 yuan tax; this part because of the Hampden Industry and other businesses do not recognize illegal, so did not apply relief, was fined 3 times. In addition, Handen and other homeowners rent 20 yuan to the owner of the house, and the owner of the house should issue an invoice to Handeng and other industries for tax filing purposes, but none of them have been issued. This part is subject to 5% penalty plus other illegal parts Penalty 3.1 times. As for whether the practice of Handen and other taxpayers lessened, officials said that whether tax revenue is less is not an important business tax law. The important spirit of the Business Tax Law is based on transaction facts and the main business tax.

Posted on